On A.S. Thousands of women have sued the company over powder-based baby powder. Law demands are looking for compensation for $ 3.5 billion for children's health. Law demands also accused the company by deliberately hiding the risk of talc exposure through their marketing. Even though the proof of installation, J & J has not fully attracted his decision to remove the product from the store shelf.
In memo to company employees, executives J & J acknowledge adverse publicity around Talc. But the company also recommends improving marketing to Hispanic and black women. But now, the health, environmental, and consumer groups demand that the company remember and remove all powder-based baby powder from the global market and stop marketing it to this community.
While the company stops selling new Talc-based baby powder in the US, it will continue to sell it in other parts of the world. The company has received almost 200 lawsuits and attracts the majority of them. Talk in baby powder is known to be contaminated with asbestos, which can cause lung cancer and ovaries. This is also dangerous for the environment. Trying additional visit Johnson & Johnson Recalls and Removes Talc-Based BabyPowder
A study conducted by Dartmouth College in 1974 found that Talk contained a trace of asbestos, which the company did not reveal to the FDA. The professor associated Talk's exposure to the "fiberform" mineral actinolite. However, this study did not find the relationship between powder and asbestos. The researchers also concluded that powder-based products were contaminated with tremolites.
In 2018, J & J received the biggest lawsuit award in US history. This award includes the names of 22 women who suffer from alleged cancer risk from powder-based baby powder exposure. In addition, the company's lawsuits were completed after the jury provided $ 4.7 billion to 22 plaintiffs. Apart from the recent controversy, powder-based powder producers have been on the market for decades and is currently safe to use today.
Reports assigned by f.d.a. said that Talk was not asbestos based. But the company acknowledged that a large number of asbestos were present in their baby powder from the 1970s until the early 2000s. The company does not disclose this information to consumers. The company is also demanded by the Indian government for claims. Law demands resulted in the suspension of Johnson's operations.
While Talc Johnson-based baby powder was once considered safe, the company had been forced to remember and stopped shipping. Then resolved with the Plaintiff for his representation error containing asbestos. Regardless of claims, lawsuits continue. The company also faces several dozens of other lawsuits that claim Talc-based baby powder causing cancer.
0 Comments